- Fraud
- Misleading
- Unfaithful
- Lies
- False
- Entrap
- Advertising
- Banks
- Politicians
- Media
- Small print
- Exaggeration
I chose the subject of deceiving adverts and how they mislead/deceive the public through false claims, incorrect visual representations and exaggeration.
As a starting point I looked at controversial anti ageing and make up adverts that have been in the news the past few years for different reasons; false accusations, or misleading images.
This first set of images are adverts for mascara, but have all been banned for their false claims or their use of false lash inserts when claiming it makes lashes thicker or adds length.
The image above was originally shot for lipstick but Dior claims it 'had been digitally enhanced in the post-production process to "tidy up" Portman’s eyelashes, replacing damaged lashes as well stylistically separating and extending them.' Even though Dior admitted to 'replacing damaged lashes as well stylistically separating and extending them' the advert states that the product is "Last-multiplying effect volume and care mascara. The miracle of nano brush for an unrivalled lash creator effect. It delivers spectacular volume-multiplying effect, lash by lash."
This image is actually worse than the Dior advert, the headline is 'Is your volume true? of "false"' From this statement the advert is asking that does your eyelash volume come from mascara or fake lashes?, it also claims the brand of mascara 'gives you true volume'. However this is all a blatant lie and it completely deceiving because in the bottom left hand corner there in tiny small print which is barely visible states 'Lash inserts were applied to both of Nicole’s lashes to add lash count before applying mascara'. The disclaimer is at complete odds with the copy in the ad because her 'volumed' lashes aren't really created by the mascara but by fake lashes. However companies are allowed to deceive consumers because they put a disclaimer in the advert.
This image shows three shots of a profile showing the models eyelashes becoming progressively longer while accompanying text explained the product and included the statement, "shot with lash inserts". It makes me think is it really an advert for mascara or false eyelashes, because it does a good job at showing what false eyelashes can do for ones eyes but not the mascara. The company behind the mascara 'admitted there were three different kinds of lash inserts used in the ads, but claimed they were not misleading as they were an accurate representation that could be achieved by using the product.' Many adverts for female make up are extremely deceiving and lead women into a false confidence thinking they'll achieve the same results but the reality there's not much change.
The only reason companies get away with such lies and deception is because the advertisement must only contain a "reasonable representation" of the item being sold. Therefore as long as the model is at least wearing the mascara even if they're wearing fake lashes it's acceptable as long as they add a disclaimer.
Another way to deceive and mislead people is by airbrushing and editing photos to such a level that models can look around 20 years younger.
'They were the ground-breaking adverts that made British women proud of their bodies - whatever shape or size - but according to reports the ad campaigns featuring 'real' women were in fact retouched.' This has recently come to light after a well known photo retoucher has claimed he had 'altered the photographs heavily'. However Dove has stated that this is lies and the only retouching was removing dust from the film and minor colour corrections.
The advert above has been banned because it's been heavily touched up to the point where it completely misleads women. L'oreal who own Lancome produced a statement saying they only retouched the image to "lighten the skin, clean up makeup, reduce dark shadows and shading around the eyes, smooth the lips and darken the brows," and added that they 'still believed the ad accurately reflected what the product could do"
They're leading on women and giving them false hope that the product will have the same effect on them when in reality it's a digitally produced image, they don't gain any trust trust from these acts because they're basically lying about their own product. They're conning females to pay extortionate amounts for a product that is falsely advertised. Research by cosmetic company Transform Cosmetic Surgery found four in ten women spend an average of £20-50 a month on anti-wrinkle creams, although 45% said they were unhappy with the results.
Food and drink
'Vitamin Water makes health claims for all of its various flavors, using words like defense, rescue, energy, and endurance. The company also says that the drinks promote a healthy state of physical and mental being, and provide the drinker with antioxidants and other nutrients that reduce age-related eye disease. While Vitamin Water does include the vitamins it lists on the labels, the advertising glosses over the fact that all of its 125 calories come from sugar, making it as unhealthy as a soft drink.' Coca cola say that no consumer could reasonably be misled into thinking Vitamin Water was a healthy beverage, which is absolute nonsense. The name and packaging of the product is completely deceiving, it comes across as a healthy drink with its clean crisp labels and the name vitamin water. You never really hear of unhealthy vitamins.
The set of images above is a series by Dario D. He traveled around fast food restaurants comparing the food to the food advertised in adverts. All apart from the Big N' Tasty were in fact far smaller and less appealing than the advertised burger which relates to my subject of deceiving adverts. They're misleading customers into wanting a product that actually doesn't exist.